It’s Not Your Father’s DFM Anymore


Reading time ( words)

Trivia question for you: What was the first design for manufacturing (DFM) tool used in the PCB industry? Answer: The eye loop.

Yes, back in the day when design organizations sent actual photoplotted films of their PCB design to the bareboard fabricator, the fabricator would put the received films on a light table and measure feature sizes for line widths, spacing between features and annular ring using an eye loop with a reticle etched onto the glass lens. If the features were beyond the capabilities of the fabricator, the job would be declined and the customer notified. If the film had extraneous features they would be removed with an Exacto knife. Voids would be filled in using a black marker.

Simpler times, then. Ten mil lines and spaces and double-sided PCBs were the norm. Manual DFM was feasible.

Needless to say, our industry has advanced in technology since those days. We have PCBs that exceed 64 layers, build-up technology with laser-formed stacked and staggered microvias, embedded devices, and complex rigid-flex circuits. And our design, fabrication, and assembly processes morphed into the new global economy, and in many cases, outsourced and off-shored.

So, what does DFM look like today? Well, for one, it’s become more than DFM. We now expect our software tools to serve us more completely to take new designs to market. DFM has evolved to become an integral part of new product introductions (NPI). Today’s NPI software spans design and manufacturing to accelerate the optimization of a PCB for manufacturing. It looks at the entire design-to-manufacturing release process and deliverables, then streamlines them.

Engineers at best-practice companies use NPI software to help identify ways to optimize their design during the initial release process, with a holistic view of their bareboard fabricators’ and assembly suppliers’ capabilities. It’s not simply a matter of catching mistakes these days. It’s about understanding the various challenges and limitations involved in the chosen manufacturing processes and then empowering the product owner to make the trade-off decisions that best serve their objectives.

To read this entire article, which appeared in the September 2017 issue of The PCB Design Magazine, click here.

Share


Suggested Items

Video from productronica 2017: Karel Tavernier on Ucamco's New Communic8tor

11/20/2017 | Pete Starkey, I-Connect007
European Editor Pete Starkey and Ucamco Managing Director Karel Tavernier discuss Ucamco’s cloud-based Communic8tor platform which facilitates two-way communication between the CAM engineer and the PCB designer, or any other party involved in the manufacturing process. This gives real-time access to image data and annotations, enabling queries to be resolved, changes to be approved, and a full communications history to be maintained.

Happy Holden and Charles Pfeil Discuss the Past and Future of PCB Design, Part 1

11/07/2017 | Barry Matties, I-Connect007
When it comes to the PCB design community and the challenges facing it, as well as where design has been and where it’s heading, there aren’t many people as qualified to speak on the topic as long-time industry veterans Happy Holden and Charles Pfeil. Joined by I-Connect007’s Barry Matties at the recent AltiumLive 2017 event in San Diego, the three sat down for a discussion about the current state of PCB design, what the future holds, and what it means to be a designer.

The History of Predictive Engineering

11/01/2017 | Happy Holden, I-Connect007
It all started in 1983, at HP, when I complained to our group's vice president that our W. Edwards Deming and Total Quality Management (TQM) Six Sigma training was being concentrated in PCB manufacturing. We had eliminated final inspection and instead placed quality in the hands of the operators with a final electrical test. The electrical test was governed by what we learned from Deming.



Copyright © 2017 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.