A Design Economics Primer


Reading time ( words)

When you start a new design, do you begin tracking costs right away, or do you wait until you have a functioning product before you start looking at the dollars and cents? Chris Young begins cost-aware design before the design cycle has even begun. Andy Shaughnessy and Nolan Johnson recently interviewed Chris, an engineer with The Goebel Company and founder of Young Engineering Services, and asked him to explain his approach to design economics.

Andy Shaughnessy: Tell us about your position and responsibilities, and we’ll go from there.

Chris Young: At The Goebel Company, I’m the chief hardware engineer. My primary responsibilities are product architecture, design, and development, which starts from a customer need and progresses into delivery and sustainability.

Shaughnessy: You have a pretty wide view of things.

Young: I’ve been lucky to be exposed to quite a bit of stuff. I’ve worked on product development from the cradle to the grave in the avionics industry, semiconductor and semiconductor test, and developing test systems for space and medical devices, ranging from airborne surveillance systems to electromechanical medical devices. I’ve had the pleasure of working with many different people in various industries.

Shaughnessy: We have been talking about design for profitability for a couple of years, and we started looking into the whole issue of design economics. In your position, how important is the cost of what you’re doing? Young: Along with the chief technologist, we are primarily responsible for the profitability of the company. The products that I design are directly related to revenue and profit.

Shaughnessy: You’re looking at the cost from the very beginning of the design cycle?

Young: You must. In my career, I have developed a systems view of what’s happening, which has shaped how I approach the issue of costs and profitability. It also depends on the environment that you’re in. I always ask myself basic questions, such as, “What are we trying to do? When do we need to do it? How are we going to do it? Which market are we addressing? What do we think our budget is?”

To read this entire article, which appeared in the April 2020 issue of Design007 Magazine, click here.

Share




Suggested Items

Designing in a Vacuum Q&A: Mark Thompson

05/12/2022 | Andy Shaughnessy, Design007 Magazine
I-Connect007 Columnist Mark Thompson of Out of the Box Manufacturing has been in CAM engineering for decades, and he’s also worked as a PCB designer, so we knew he would have a few things to say about working in a vacuum. As he explains, the designer isn’t the only stakeholder in the process who feels like he’s working inside the dust bag of a Hoover upright.

Designing in a Vacuum Q&A: Carl Schattke

05/11/2022 | Andy Shaughnessy, Design007 Magazine
Not long ago, I caught up with Carl Schattke, CEO of PCB Product Development LLC and a longtime PCB designer, for his thoughts on “designing in a vacuum.” As Carl points out, if you follow PCB design best practices, knowing the identity of your fabricator is not a “must-have.” He also offers some communication tips for discovering the information you do need, including one old-fashioned technique—just asking for it.

Tips for Designing in—and Escaping From—the Vacuum

05/10/2022 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team
We asked Monsoon Solutions VP of Engineering Jen Kolar if she had any thoughts on “designing in a vacuum,” and her response was, “Absolutely!” In this wide-ranging discussion, Jen and Senior PCB Engineer and Director of Designer Development Cory Grunwald share some tips and techniques for designing PCBs in a vacuum, and a few methods for getting out of the Hoover’s dust bag. As Cory points out, “In the end, the communication is going to happen anyway. It’s just a matter of whether it happens at the end or in the beginning.”



Copyright © 2022 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.