A Design Economics Primer


Reading time ( words)

When you start a new design, do you begin tracking costs right away, or do you wait until you have a functioning product before you start looking at the dollars and cents? Chris Young begins cost-aware design before the design cycle has even begun. Andy Shaughnessy and Nolan Johnson recently interviewed Chris, an engineer with The Goebel Company and founder of Young Engineering Services, and asked him to explain his approach to design economics.

Andy Shaughnessy: Tell us about your position and responsibilities, and we’ll go from there.

Chris Young: At The Goebel Company, I’m the chief hardware engineer. My primary responsibilities are product architecture, design, and development, which starts from a customer need and progresses into delivery and sustainability.

Shaughnessy: You have a pretty wide view of things.

Young: I’ve been lucky to be exposed to quite a bit of stuff. I’ve worked on product development from the cradle to the grave in the avionics industry, semiconductor and semiconductor test, and developing test systems for space and medical devices, ranging from airborne surveillance systems to electromechanical medical devices. I’ve had the pleasure of working with many different people in various industries.

Shaughnessy: We have been talking about design for profitability for a couple of years, and we started looking into the whole issue of design economics. In your position, how important is the cost of what you’re doing? Young: Along with the chief technologist, we are primarily responsible for the profitability of the company. The products that I design are directly related to revenue and profit.

Shaughnessy: You’re looking at the cost from the very beginning of the design cycle?

Young: You must. In my career, I have developed a systems view of what’s happening, which has shaped how I approach the issue of costs and profitability. It also depends on the environment that you’re in. I always ask myself basic questions, such as, “What are we trying to do? When do we need to do it? How are we going to do it? Which market are we addressing? What do we think our budget is?”

To read this entire article, which appeared in the April 2020 issue of Design007 Magazine, click here.

Share




Suggested Items

A New Sourcing Paradigm

09/20/2022 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team
We’ve seen many changes over the past few years, and nowhere are they more evident than in the world of sourcing components. Sourcing has become one of the biggest challenges facing PCB designers and design engineers today. Gone are the days of procuring parts from a single source, and communication between stakeholders and distributors is critical. But as we learned in a conversation with I-Connect007 columnist Kelly Dack, PCB designers can use certain layout strategies to plan for the unexpected, such as leaving extra real estate so that smaller components can be replaced by larger, readily available parts if the originals become “unobtainium.”

Happy’s Design Tips for Material Conservation

08/25/2022 | Happy Holden, I-Connect007
For this issue, Happy Holden provided a range of options for designers who are seeking to conserve materials in their next design. He also offered an example of the relative cost index, or RCI, that he developed at HP exclusively for PCB design. With this RCI, designers can figure out the relative cost of a new design compared to an eight-layer through-hole board. We hope you can use this handy formula on your next design job.

Cadence Provides ‘Clarity’ in Design Tool

08/11/2022 | Nolan Johnson, I-Connect007
Nolan Johnson recently spoke with Brad Griffin, product marketing director for Cadence Design Systems, about Cadence’s Matrix solver technology. They discuss its use as a multi-disciplinary field solver as well as Cadence’s focus on thermal analysis and utilizing the power of the cloud.



Copyright © 2022 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.