Comparing Cable Shields

Reading time ( words)

In my October column, we looked at the importance of properly terminating cables even at low frequencies and also showed how much detail we can lose in PDN measurements when we use bad-quality cables. In this column we will analyze a step further the shield in our cables.

As a reminder, Figure 1 shows the noise pickup through the shield of two different cables. Data was captured with a 1-GHz bandwidth oscilloscope. Both cables had 50-ohm factory-mounted BNC connectors at their ends. The oscilloscope input was switched to 50-ohm input impedance and the cables were attached to a DUT with a BNC connector. The DUT (a small DC-DC converter evaluation board) was turned off, generating no signal on its own. The noise we see on the oscilloscope is the signal pickup of the cable from the air.

Figure 1: Voltage measured at the DUT BNC connector with two different cables, with the DUT turned off.

The signal of more than 8 mVpp that we see with one of the cables was consistent, not only occasional short bursts. I live in a residential area in the woods, with no visible industrial plant or antenna tower nearby. It might be interesting to track down the source of the noise, but from my perspective it is more useful to look at the differences in the cable braid constructions.

Flexible coaxial cables have conductive foil, braided wire or a combination of these serving as the outer conductor, which also serves as shield in single-ended cables. Braided shields come in single or multiple layers of wire mesh. The cables used for Figure 1 have single-braided shield with no foil.

Read the full column here.

Editor's Note: This column originally appeared in the December 2013 issue of The PCB Design Magazine.


Warning: array_rand(): Second argument has to be between 1 and the number of elements in the array in /home/iconnect/releases/20160311/public_html/elements/next_item.php on line 41

Suggested Items

Video from productronica 2017: Karel Tavernier on Ucamco's New Communic8tor

11/20/2017 | Pete Starkey, I-Connect007
European Editor Pete Starkey and Ucamco Managing Director Karel Tavernier discuss Ucamco’s cloud-based Communic8tor platform which facilitates two-way communication between the CAM engineer and the PCB designer, or any other party involved in the manufacturing process. This gives real-time access to image data and annotations, enabling queries to be resolved, changes to be approved, and a full communications history to be maintained.

Signal Integrity: The Experts Weigh In

11/14/2017 | The I-Connect007 Team
When we began planning the October issue on signal integrity, we arranged a conference call with a variety of industry experts. Mike Steinberger of SiSoft, Mark Thompson of Prototron Circuits, and Yogen and Sunny Patel of Candor Industries joined editors Andy Shaughnessy, Patty Goldman, Happy Holden and Publisher Barry Matties on the call for a spirited discussion about the challenges related to signal integrity and some of the tricks of the trade for helping ensure SI.

Nine Dot Connects: Good Design Instruction is a True Value-Add

11/09/2017 | Andy Shaughnessy, PCBDesign007
Nine Dot Connects has certainly blazed an interesting trail. The company started out as an Altium reseller, but in less than a decade, Nine Dot Connects has also become a design service bureau and a provider of PCB design instruction, training, and consulting services. I recently interviewed Paul Taubman, technical services director for Nine Dot Connects. We discussed the company’s expansion from VAR to service bureau and content provider, and the changing landscape of PCB design instruction.

Copyright © 2017 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.