Everything You Wanted to Know, But Were Afraid to Ask


Reading time ( words)

This month, Testing Todd presents readers’ questions about the basics of electrical test, including the different types of testing available today.

 

Reader: I recently found out that all points are not necessarily checked during electrical test. Why is that and which types of boards do not get all of their points tested? Isn’t there a chance that something will be missed? Is there a type of test that hits all of the points?

Todd: When a board is programmed for test, certain points of the board are de-selected. To properly answer this question, we need to revisit IPC-9252A, Amendment 1, which stipulates that Class I and II can remove the mid-points of a net on the board. What this means is that we are only concerned with the end-to-end connectivity of the net. With IPC Class III we need to include the mid-points of the net to quickly isolate any problems in the chain. However, this is cautioned by the additive properties of solder mask encroachment or via-fill. In these cases, although Class III, they cannot be tested and are allowed the waiver under the 9252A with Amendment 1 release.

Within the Class III requirement of 9252A with Amendment 1, we can add probes to validate each landing pad. With Class I and II we are only validating the end points of the net to make sure the signature is intact. By adding mid-points with Class III we validate that the connectivity is valid to all landing pads. This is in case there may be contamination to any of the intermediate landing pads in the chain of the net.

Adding all pads in the net is referred to as Class III per IPC-9252A with Amendment 1, which hits all of the points.

Read the full column here.


Editor's Note: This column originally appeared in the May 2014 issue of The PCB Magazine.

Share

Print


Suggested Items

Meet Chris Mitchell, I-Connect007 Columnist

08/14/2019 | I-Connect007
Chris Mitchell is vice president for global government affairs at IPC—Association Connecting Electronics Industries—where he is responsible for development and implementation of the organization’s global advocacy efforts and public policy agenda with a focus on electronics industry business improvement, environment, health and safety, and defense initiatives.

Avoiding CAF Failures at the IPC High-reliability Forum

12/31/1969 | Andy Shaughnessy, I-Connect007
Foresite CEO Terry Munson recently spoke with Andy Shaughnessy during the IPC High-Reliability Forum and Microvia Summit in Baltimore about his presentation on the causes of conductive anodic filament (CAF), the dangers of resin starvation, and what advice he'd give to PCB designers to avoid those types of failures.

Crowded Congressional Calendar Affects Industry Priorities

07/24/2019 | Chris Mitchell, IPC VP, Global Government Relations
More than five months remain in 2019, but U.S. congressional leaders are already running out of time as they face a long list of must-pass bills before year’s end. Although some of these bills do not affect the electronics industry, some of them do, and the overall agenda does affect the opportunities and risks we face.



Copyright © 2019 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.