Karel Tavernier: The Gerber Guide


Reading time ( words)

It is clearly possible to fabricate PCBs from the fabrication data sets currently being used—it's being done innumerable times every day all over the globe. But is it being done in an efficient, reliable, automated and standardized manner? At this moment in time, the honest answer is no, because there is plenty of room for improvement in the way in which PCB fabrication data is currently transferred from design to fabrication.

This is not about the format, which for over 90% of the world's PCB production is Gerber: There are very rarely problems with Gerber files themselves. They allow images to be transferred without a hitch. In fact, the Gerber format is part of the solution, given that it is the most reliable option in this field. The problems actually lie in which images are transferred, how the format is used and—more often—in how it is not used.

In this monthly column, Karel Tavernier explains in detail how to use the newly revised Gerber data format to communicate with your fabrication partners clearly and simply, using an unequivocal yet versatile language that enables you and them to get the very best out of your design data. Each month we will look at a different aspect of the design-to-fabrication data transfer process.

This column has been excerpted from the guide, PCB Fabrication Data: Design-to-Fabrication Data Transfer.

 

Chapter 1: How PCB Design Data is used by the Fabricator

In this first article of the series, we’ll be looking at what happens to the designer's data once it reaches the fabricator. This is not just a nice add-on, because for designers to construct truly valid PCB data sets, they must have a clear understanding of how their data is used. This, more than anything else, clarifies how it should be prepared.

We will not look at how to design PCBs for easy fabrication, which is completely outside the remit of the developer of the Gerber format and a matter for the PCB fabricators themselves.

What does a PCB fabricator do with CAD fabrication data?

PCBs are typically fabricated in about 22 steps, many of which are digitally controlled and require dedicated data modules called production tools.

Some designers believe that their PCB fabrication data will drive the fabricator's production machines directly; that the Gerber files will be used directly on the PCB fabricator's photoplotter; that Excellon drill files will go straight onto the fabricator's drilling machines; and that IPC-D-356A netlist will go right into electrical test machines.

Not so. Fabricators never use the Gerber or Excellon files directly on their equipment.

There are many reasons for this, the simplest of which is panelization. Even though the designer's data describes a single PCB or maybe an array, the job is never manufactured as such. It is always put on a production panel, which will typically have multiple jobs on it, as well as a border for plating, test coupons, etc. 

To read this entire article, which appeared in the July 2015 issue of The PCB Design Magazine, click here.

Share

Print


Suggested Items

Just Ask Heidi Barnes: The Exclusive Compilation

01/15/2021 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team
We asked for your questions for Keysight Technologies' Heidi Barnes, and you took us up on it! We know you all enjoyed reading these questions and answers, so we’ve compiled all of them into one article for easy reference. We hope you enjoy having another bite at the apple.

TTM’s Approach to Stackup Design: Train the Customer

01/12/2021 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team
In this interview with the I-Connect007 Editorial Team, TTM’s Julie Ellis and Richard Dang drill down into stackup design, detailing some of the common stackup challenges that their customers face when designing for both prototype and volume levels, and offering advice to designers or engineers who are struggling with stackup issues. They also discuss why having too many different prepregs in a stackup can be asking for trouble, and how proper stackup design can optimize both the fabrication and assembly processes.

Cutting Respins: Journey to the Single-spin PCB

01/07/2021 | Chris Young, The Goebel Company
PCB design is more than a short sprint to the finish line; it is a journey best suited for the prepared adventurer. According to a study by Lifecycle Insights, the average PCB design project requires 2.9 respins. These respins can cost anywhere from tens of thousands to millions of dollars—each! As an engineer/business owner, I find respins frustrating because I would rather spend my time and money applying scientific principles inventing, improving technology, and solving problems. I am not an advocate for perfectionism, but rather I focus on becoming a better adventurer. Sometimes I get to taste the sweet wine that is a single spin PCB. As fellow adventurers, let’s discuss some topics that influence unnecessary return trips on our PCB design journey: simulation, technical reviews, and interest in PCB design.



Copyright © 2021 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.