Let's Talk Testing: Seeing is Believing in Fractographic Analysis


Reading time ( words)

One of the more common types of failure analysis is the investigation of something that has broken. For this column, we will be discussing a broken material, or, more commonly, a fractured or cracked material.

Fractographic analysis is sometimes perceived as a difficult analysis, given its roots in material science, but one might be surprised to learn that failure modes for this type of study are well-established and well reported and can easily be found in textbooks, reference materials, and even with a Google search!  Given that, this column is not being written to teach a lesson in fractographic failure modes, but more so to provide some insight in performing the analysis yourself, or at least give you some direction to get things started.

sellers0716.jpgUnlike many types of forensic analyses, a fractographic investigation most times doesn’t really need any high dollar, sophisticated instrumentation or equipment. This is true because the most pertinent information in a fracture based investigation is simply the visual examination of the fracture surface itself. Now, that can be problematic in some instances, because the fractured surface can become damaged before it is discovered. If a crack happens and is still connected on one end, it’s possible that the opposing surfaces of the fracture can make contact with each other—through movement of the specimen while still in use or even through simple vibration—potentially damaging the surface characteristics that are needed to determine the failure mode at hand. This is not overly common, but can happen, and as such it’s worth mentioning here. For this reason, one recommendation that can be made is…don’t put the pieces back together! In line with what has been mentioned just a few sentences ago, putting the fractured pieces back together can accidentally damage what you’re really trying to inspect.

Read the full column here.

 

Editor's Note: This column originally appeared in the July 2016 issue of The PCB Magazine. This is Keith’s first in a series of columns having to do with inspection and test— from the test lab perspective.

Share

Print


Suggested Items

Solder Mask Tack Dry

11/08/2019 | Nikolaus Schubkegel
As a general rule, the tack-dry temperature should be as low as possible; in other words, it should only be as high as necessary. If the temperature is too low, the evaporation rate for the solvent will be to slow, and the solder mask will not dry in a reasonable amount of time. If the temperature is too high, however, the dry time certainly will be excellent, but it could create a solder mask lock-in with repercussions by the developing time.

Meet George Milad, I-Connect007 Columnist

10/31/2019 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team
Meet George Milad, one of our newest I-Connect007 columnists! George’s columns will cover PCB plating, IPC specifications, and more. George is the recipient of the 2009 IPC President’s Award, chairs the IPC Plating Committee, and is a permanent member of the IPC Technical Activities Executive Committee.

New High-speed 3D Surface Imaging Technology in Electronics Manufacturing Applications

10/09/2019 | Juha Saily, Focalspec Inc.
Line confocal sensors—and scanners based on them—are used in the imaging of surfaces, transparent materials, and multi-layered structures in various metrology and inspection applications on discrete parts, assemblies, webs, and other continuous products. Line confocal sensors operate at high speed and can be used to scan fast-moving surfaces in real-time as well as stationary product samples in the laboratory.



Copyright © 2019 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.