Carrying the Flag


Reading time ( words)

The September 2019 issue of PCB007 Magazine concludes our month-long look at industry standards. We wrap up by "waving the standard" in celebration. Of course, that phrase immediately piques the interest of us wordsmiths. Why, after all, do English speakers use "standard" as a synonym for a flag?

The etymology of the word "standard" starts to answer that question. It is widely recognized and cited by scholars that by the mid-twelfth century, standard referred to "a flag or other conspicuous object to serve as a rallying point for a military force." Numerous etymologists suggest that the Franks (a Germanic tribe from the Rhine river regions) introduced the word "standhard," which meant to stand fast or firm. The "standhard" was a flag attached to a pole or spear, standing upright in the ground.

Tracing the history of flags and standards leads us to this quote from Encyclopedia Britannica: "In Europe, the first 'national' flags were adopted in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance… Toward the end of the Middle Ages, flags had become accepted symbols of countries, kings, organizations, cities, and guilds." The flag's dimensions became significant as well. Britannica continues, "Flags were subdivided according to their shape and purpose into standards, banners, guidons, pennons, and streamers. Of the main types, the standard was the largest, and from its size, was intended to be stationary. It marked the position of an important individual before a battle, during a siege, throughout a ceremony, or at a tournament. For the monarch, it marked the palace, castle, saluting base, tent, or ship where he or she was actually present."

The flag standard became the symbol of the "rule of law" and a rallying point for those who supported that particular institution. It's no small wonder, then, that the term has expanded to include other systems that function as law by mutual agreement. The process of reaching that agreement can be a long, arduous road to travel. In this issue, we look at standards both as processes and rallying points. Follow the standards, and your results will be both better and compatible with the rest of the industry.

To read the full article, which appeared in the September 2019 issue of PCB007 Magazine, click here.

Share

Print


Suggested Items

Future of 'Substances and Materials in Products' Data Exchange Formats as Standards

10/16/2019 | Jean-Pierre Theret, Dassault Systèmes
This article provides a simplified, state-of-the-art description of the data exchange formats for standards covering substances and materials reporting in products and processes. It also reviews existing issues and new challenges shared with end users of the standards and companies represented by their trade associations with some solution proposals they could discuss.

Standards: Why We Have Them and Live by Them

10/07/2019 | Alifiya Arastu, Jeff Beauchamp, Harry Kennedy, and Ruben Contreras, NCAB GROUP
Have you ever designed a board but received feedback that it couldn’t be manufactured unless changes were made? Or maybe you’ve designed a complex board and sent it to the factory only to find out that the manufacturer didn’t build the board to your expectations? PCBs are becoming more complex, factory options are growing, and expectations for product life cycles are becoming longer.

Is It Time to Shake Up Materials Standards?

10/02/2019 | I-Connect007 Editorial Team
COO Mark Goodwin and Technology Ambassador Alun Morgan from Ventec International Group describes how they feel current standards do not sufficiently recognize the needs of end customers today with new processes and materials being shoehorned into old standards based on dated ideas of classifications, and how this makes choosing the right material challenging for designers.



Copyright © 2019 I-Connect007. All rights reserved.